Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4's 81.9 overall score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than Google Pixel 4. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller display and a much lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a less mega pixels camera, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting images in low-light environments, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 4, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.