Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G's overall score of 87.5. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is noticeably heavier but thinner than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and both of them were only released 2 months apart. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide you identical OS features.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, a worse (4K) video definition and a less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4a 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 4a 5G, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.