Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Honor 50 Pro, having a overall score of 94.6 against 77. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is thinner than the Honor 50 Pro, although it's extremely heavier and was released around 9 months before. Honor 50 Pro has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower 1236 x 2676px resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little faster processor than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Honor 50 Pro count with incredibly similar storage to store more apps and games, both have the same internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity. The Honor 50 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.