Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 372 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than HTC U11, getting a 94.6 score against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC U11's, but it is also much heavier. The HTC U11 features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 2560px resolution, it also counts with a higher pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little better performance than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better battery life than HTC U11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures slightly better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a 12 mega-pixels camera in the back, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC U11. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC U11, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.