Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a lot better than LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and somewhat thinner than LG G7 Fit's, although it's also noticeably heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior processing power than LG G7 Fit, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. The LG G7 Fit counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes clearer pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.