Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than the LG G7 ThinQ's global score of 81. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than the LG G7 ThinQ's, but it is also incredibly heavier.
LG G7 ThinQ has a brighter display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a much higher pixel amount per screen inch. The LG G7 ThinQ features a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior CPU than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a camera with a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution, a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images and videos and a lower video definition, it also counts with a lot larger sensor.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G7 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG G7 ThinQ, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.