Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is way better than LG K52's 76 score. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version and LG K52 has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and LG K52 were released with only a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is thinner but heavier than LG K52.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better processing power than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better screen than LG K52, because it has a bigger display, a greater pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a bit better photographs and videos than LG K52, because although it has a much worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
LG K52 has a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better battery duration than LG K52, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.