Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Titanium and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the LG K61's score of 77.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the LG K61 were released only 5 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is notably heavier but also thinner than the LG K61.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior CPU than LG K61, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. LG K61 counts with a display that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, because although the LG K61 has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density.
The LG K61 counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG K61, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better camera than LG K61, because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.