Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than LG K92, having a global score of 94.6 against 85.4. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is thinner but heavier than LG K92, and they were released with only 2 months difference. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a better 1768 x 2208px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit faster CPU than LG K92, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM.
LG K92 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality photos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG K92 also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The LG K92 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little bit longer battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG K92. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG K92, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.