Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than LG Q70, getting a 94.6 score against 77.9. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is way heavier but thinner than the LG Q70, and they were only released with a couple months difference.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster CPU than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more vivid screen than LG Q70, because although it has a just a little lower amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution and a bigger screen.
The LG Q70 counts with a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than LG Q70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
LG Q70 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a much smaller sensor shooting lot worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Q70. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG Q70, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.