Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the LG Stylo 6's global score of 76.7. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the LG Stylo 6 were released only 4 months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is much heavier but much thinner. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the LG Stylo 6 count with extremely similar displays, because although the LG Stylo 6 has a quite smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2460, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. LG Stylo 6 has a better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit faster processing unit than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger camera sensor.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Stylo 6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG Stylo 6, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.