Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the LG V10's 78.6 general score. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and much thinner phone than LG V10, but it's much heavier.
The LG V10 counts with a better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen. LG V10 counts with more storage for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a more powerful processor than LG V10, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior battery life than LG V10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. LG V10 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V10 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and higher video frame rates.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V10. If you want to save some money, you can buy the LG V10, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.