Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 score. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the LG V30S ThinQ, but it is way heavier. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a little bit higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 12 MP resolution camera, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or video in low light situations and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more than LG V30S ThinQ, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.