Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a little bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, having a 94.6 score against 87.6. These devices use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and LG V60 ThinQ were released with only 6 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is thinner but also a lot heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better processing power than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and LG V60 ThinQ both count with similar screens, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch of screen.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a way worse (4K) video resolution, a tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a lower image quality and a way lower resolution camera in the back, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V60 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some money and get the LG V60 ThinQ, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.