Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a little bit better than the LG Wing's 91.2 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is a bit heavier but noticeably thinner than LG Wing, and both were released with only 1 months difference. These phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version while LG Wing has Android 10 version.
LG Wing features a screen that's very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although the LG Wing has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful processor than LG Wing, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
The LG Wing has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage, the LG Wing also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Wing takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the LG Wing also has a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better battery lifetime than LG Wing, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Wing, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Wing. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy LG Wing, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.