Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, with a global score of 94.6 against 87.1. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and a lot heavier than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, it's body is still thinner. These phones include the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little larger display and a better 1768 x 2208 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM. Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and faster video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a little better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.