Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, having a global score of 94.6 against 92.8. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Motorola Edge 20 Pro has Android 12 version. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is somewhat thinner than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, although it is heavier and was released just 11 months before.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a little bit better performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has as much storage capacity to install applications and games as the Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a battery life that's just as good as the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.