Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Motorola Edge (2022), with a score of 94.6 against 84.7. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is somewhat thinner than Motorola Edge (2022), although it's way heavier and was released just a little over a year before.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a screen that is very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although the Motorola Edge (2022) has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Edge (2022) has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a lot better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Edge (2022), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Edge (2022). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Edge (2022), letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.