Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 overall score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and much heavier than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's body is still just a little bit thinner.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a much more MP back camera and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.