Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a global score of 94.6 against 80.9. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and notably heavier than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's design is still somewhat thinner. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.