Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, getting a 94.6 score against 77. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is somewhat thinner than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it is much heavier and was released 3 years before.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Neo captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a larger camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.