Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with a 94.6 score against 83.4. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is incredibly thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it is noticeably heavier and was released many years before.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels quantity per display inch. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as the Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, both have equal internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 12 GB RAM memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a much better video definition and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.