Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an a lot older and heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with as much storage capacity for applications and games as the Galaxy Z Fold 2, both of them have equal internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a larger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.