Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a score of 94.6 against 86.3. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot older and noticeably heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's construction is still thinner. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality, a much more mega pixels back camera and a lot larger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a battery performance that's just as good as the Galaxy Z Fold 2 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.