Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 overall score. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a notably older and heavier device than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but Samsung could make it notably thinner anyway.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both have 12 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 both have really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.