Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto G 5G's score of 81.5. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is noticeably thinner but much heavier than Motorola Moto G 5G, and they were released with only a couple months difference.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a just a little lower pixels quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a quite larger screen.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Moto G 5G counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G 5G features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.