Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Moto G 5G Plus were released with only 2 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is extremely thinner but also noticeably heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus have very similar displays, because although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a quite lower 1080 x 2520 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera sensor and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Moto G 5G Plus features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.