Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Motorola Moto G Power, with a score of 94.6 against 76.1. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is a lot thinner but way heavier than the Motorola Moto G Power, and both were released with only 5 months difference. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G Power, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution and a larger screen. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images and videos, a way worse 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Power, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Moto G Power features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G Power, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.