Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021)'s overall score of 76.5. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is thinner but a lot heavier than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and they were only released 4 months apart. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a bigger display, a way higher 1768 x 2208px resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better performance than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto G Power (2021) counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity. Moto G Power (2021) features a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Power (2021) also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations and a much better resolution camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power (2021). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some money and buy the Moto G Power (2021), resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.