Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), having a 94.6 score against 79.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) were released with only a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is extremely heavier but also noticeably thinner.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a better 1768 x 2208px resolution.
Moto G Stylus (2021) features a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior battery life than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus (2021) takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and videos and a camera in the back with much more MP.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Stylus (2021). If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto G Stylus (2021), letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.