Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-06-14 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Cosmic Emerald |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s global score of 82.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) were only released 9 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is extremely thinner but notably heavier. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution and a quite bigger display.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a much worse 12 MP resolution camera, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Stylus 5G (2021). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some money and get the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.