Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), having a overall score of 94.6 against 76. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an extremely older and extremely heavier phone than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung was able to build it way thinner anyway. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite worse display pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) feature quite similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, slower video frame rate and a lot tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.