Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is just a bit better than Moto G100's 88.9 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Moto G100 were released only 7 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is thinner but much heavier. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should count with very similar OS features.
Motorola Moto G100's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although the Motorola Moto G100 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Moto G100 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Moto G100 counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G100 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G100 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller sensor taking lower quality photographs, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations, a lot better video definition and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.