Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a bit better than the Moto G200 5G's 86.2 score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is way thinner than Moto G200 5G, although it is notably heavier and was released just 14 months before. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user identical operating system features.
Moto G200 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 have really similar displays, because although the Moto G200 5G has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G200 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better processing power than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Moto G200 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Moto G200 5G features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.