Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-02-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Pastel sky and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G30, with a 94.6 score against 78.1. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Motorola Moto G30 were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is thinner but notably heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a brighter display than Moto G30, because it has a greater screen pixel density, a way higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a larger screen.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better processing power than Moto G30, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. The Moto G30 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G30 also has a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera and a bigger aperture.
Motorola Moto G30 counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G30 counts with a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.