Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-01-28 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Moto G41's score of 79.1. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an older and incredibly heavier phone than Moto G41, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G41, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Moto G41 and Galaxy Z Fold 2 count with similar screens, because although the Moto G41 has a little bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures clearer photographs and videos than Moto G41, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos and a much worse 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Moto G41 features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Moto G41 counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.