Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Moto G51 5G, having a score of 94.6 against 77.8. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is incredibly thinner than the Moto G51 5G, but it is incredibly heavier and was released only 15 months before. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better processing power than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a little bit bigger display. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better storage for applications and games than Moto G51 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Moto G51 5G takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G51 5G also has better video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution. The Motorola Moto G51 5G features just a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.