Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-04-19 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto G6 Plus's global score of 77.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is heavier than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, it's somewhat thinner and also noticeably newer. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
The Moto G6 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 count with similar screens, because although the Moto G6 Plus has a really smaller screen and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a little better count of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate and a way bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs and videos.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way better battery life than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.