Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | -- |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Moto G60s, getting a 94.6 score against 79.9. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is much thinner but noticeably heavier than the Moto G60s. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better processing power than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a little bit bigger display. Moto G60s has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G60s also counts with a way more MP camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos.
Motorola Moto G60s features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G60s features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.