Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Moto G7 Plus, having a 94.6 score against 76.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way heavier than Moto G7 Plus, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10, providing lots of additional features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better performing processor than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit sharper display than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality, a way less MP back facing camera and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much bigger sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better battery duration than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.