Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Moto G71 5G, having a 94.6 score against 82.9. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and way heavier than the Moto G71 5G, it's design is still somewhat thinner. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide the user the same operating system features.
Moto G71 5G features a screen that is very similar to the Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, because although the Moto G71 5G has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher quantity of pixels in each screen inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better performance than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G71 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Moto G71 5G features a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.