Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power's score of 76. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Motorola Moto G8 Power were only released with a few months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is thinner but notably heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better looking display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Moto G8 Power, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a back camera with much less MP resolution, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos and a lower video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
The Moto G8 Power has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G8 Power. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G8 Power, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.