Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Moto G84, getting a score of 94.6 against 80.9. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Moto G84 has Android 13. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior performance than Moto G84. They have 8 cores and a 12 GB RAM memory.
Moto G84 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per display inch. The Moto G84 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto G84 also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Motorola Moto G84 features as much storage to install applications and games as Galaxy Z Fold 2, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G84 features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.