Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Motorola Moto G9 Play, having a 94.6 score against 76.7. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, so it gives you some nice extra features. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is incredibly heavier but way thinner than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, and they were released with only a few months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a brighter screen than Moto G9 Play, because it has a larger display, a greater pixels density and a much better 1768 x 2208 resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G9 Play, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G9 Play has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
The Moto G9 Play shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Play also has a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos, a lot more MP camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.