Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Plus's overall score of 80.5. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is extremely heavier but also extremely thinner than Motorola Moto G9 Plus.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster processing unit than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little sharper display than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger display and a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution.
The Moto G9 Plus shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G9 Plus also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger back camera sensor.
Moto G9 Plus has a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G9 Plus counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.