Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G9 Power's overall score of 78.6. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is much heavier but notably thinner than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and both of them were only released 3 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster processor than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a more vivid display than Moto G9 Power, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels, a quite bigger display and a better count of pixels per display inch.
Moto G9 Power features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Moto G9 Power also has a much more mega pixels back facing camera. The Moto G9 Power counts with just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.