Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-09-18 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Moto Z Force, with a 94.6 score against 75.8. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a extremely newer and just a little bit thinner phone than Moto Z Force, although it is heavier. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM. Motorola Moto Z Force features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560, it also counts with a better display density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z Force, although it has a camera with much less mega pixels resolution and a worse video quality, they both have a same size aperture. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with improved battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z Force, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.