Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a 94.6 score against 76.4. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot heavier than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's just a little thinner and also much newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster CPU than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a worse video definition and a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12 MP resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has better battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.