Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a 94.6 score against 77.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's somewhat thicker and way heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per inch of display. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a camera with a 12 megapixels and the same video resolution, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has better video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and video and a way bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.