Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Moto Z2 Play, with a general score of 94.6 against 77.4. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is notably newer, but thicker and much heavier than the Moto Z2 Play. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better processing power than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a better 1768 x 2208px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes much better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.